4 ms·
Takes too long to get to their first point about accounting. By the time I got to the first point about accounting, I was already bored. In reading the first
by aeoleonn 6y ago
Takes too long to get to their first point about accounting.
By the time I got to the first point about accounting, I was already bored. In reading the first point I realized it is too vague to be persuasive. Stopped there.
Decided to look for author to see if they even have a background in accounting.
... author not identified
- readflaggedcomm 6y agoThe author uses a handle (linked under the header) which is the same as https://twitter.com/cian0o https://twitter.com/cian0o which links to this blog and provides a name. The article also does include a note about their studies: "undergraduate in marketing and a postgraduate in finance." Though it seems more of a philosophical piece.
- anon_tor_12345 6y ago>Stopped there. why do these comments pop up on HN all the time? why is it so critical that we get feedback from haughty readers? this is basically a tldr dismissal. how is that "curious" or "good faith" or whatever it is that HN bills itself as? if you think the article isn't high quality then just downvote. instead these comments become rallying points for people to have their biases reaffirmed.
- Taylor_OD 6y agoFor every, "This post is not well written" post there is a, "Why do people write this post is not well written?" post.
- anon_tor_12345 6y agonote i didn't weigh in on the content anywhere. i'm simply sick of seeing people proudly proclaim their own impatience. we get it your time is too precious to read the entire thing (but not too precious that you can't drop a comment).
- commandlinefan 6y agoWell, I felt the same way as OP and came to the comments to see if it was just me. I appreciated finding out it wasn't.
- anon_tor_12345 6y ago>these comments become rallying points for people to have their biases reaffirmed