> Equating the two is ridiculous. When someone wants to defend the indefensible, false equivalency seems like the go-to tactic nowadays. It's basically: "Afte

> Equating the two is ridiculous. When someone wants to defend the indefensible, false equivalency seems like the go-to tactic nowadays. It's basically: "After ignoring all the extremely important differences, isn't this thing you like just like this thing you hate? Hypocrite."