>What am I missing here? I guess you are missing the tendency of most people to decide that a man who was arrested for torturing and raping a child should not

>What am I missing here? I guess you are missing the tendency of most people to decide that a man who was arrested for torturing and raping a child should not be a part of any kind of governmental campaign. I understand he wasn't yet convicted, and that presumption of innocence is fundamental to our justice system. But I also understand that charges like these don't appear out of thin air, and that charges are usually only made by authorities if a conviction is highly probable. And finally, I find it pretty absurd that one could live in the same house as this person and not have a clue as to what was going on. Just imagine being in the green party and hearing about this. "Hey guys, I chose my dad as my manager. He's currently on trial for torturing and raping a child, but fingers crossed!!!"