> But they insist on "democracy" which is ridiculous, as it didn't happen under the British. What is your argument here? They did not had democracy before so t

> But they insist on "democracy" which is ridiculous, as it didn't happen under the British. What is your argument here? They did not had democracy before so they should not complain to not have it now? How twisted is that. Also, I don't think claiming your constitutional right to democracy can be tagged as "ridiculous". Universal suffrage and democratic election are parts of the "Basic law", the equivalent of the constitution, that the PRC signed as part of the handover "deal".