3 ms·
Honestly, no. Association with child rapists is fairly bad, but I don't see how you're supposed to just bar people who themselves didn't do anything illegal fro
by nonameiguess 6y ago
Honestly, no. Association with child rapists is fairly bad, but I don't see how you're supposed to just bar people who themselves didn't do anything illegal from ever being employed at all anywhere. She needs to do something for work and this is pretty harmless compared to being a politician, which she should absolutely be barred from.
- enragedcacti 6y agoI think harmless is working at a grocery store or writing code for a smart lightbulb, not helping to decide what stays and what goes on a website with a really problematic history of managing what is acceptable content in terms of child pornography, among other things. I think redditors have a right to be skeptical, especially when there are so many people like her husband trying to attach pedophilia to the LGBT cause.
- root_axis 6y agoI'd like to expand on this a little more. Do you think these communities are wrong for their protest? Personally, I think it's fair for the users of reddit to express their displeasure with respect to how reddit operates the business, even in situations where I might disagree with the sentiment (though this isn't such a case).
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]