5 ms·

6 of them, in violation of city ordinances. Two on the grass. We all agreed to the rules.

• leetcrew 6y ago
  you already established it was illegal. is that the only reason it bothers you, or is there something else?
  • sjg007 6y ago
    What about what?
    • ryandrake 6y ago
      I think the question is: Why is there an ordinance against this? What is morally wrong with having vehicles on one's own property? How does it affect the neighbors? If the only answer is "well it reduces property values," well, there are tons of things that also reduce property values that are not illegal. That is not a good reason to have a city ordinance against something.
      • throwaway0a5e 6y ago
        >Why is there an ordinance? Even ignoring money and property values, the answers (for most ordinances, not just this one) are gonna all be various ways to put lipstick on the "behavior not befitting the people who can afford to live here" pig.
        • sjg007 6y ago
          Ordinances restrict meth labs too.
          • int_19h 6y ago
            Meth labs explode every now and then, so that actually makes sense.
• yardie 6y ago
  > We all agreed to the rules. Who came up with the rules? And have you carried out a survey to see if everyone agreed to the rules? If you lived there before the rule is in place can you opt out if you disagree?
• int_19h 6y ago
  Let me rephrase that. Do you support the ordinances in question? If so, why?