3 ms·
Based on the comparison shown between using the third party scripts with tracking, and using the smart block stand-in, I wonder if this could be an edge against
by 29083011397778 6y ago
Based on the comparison shown between using the third party scripts with tracking, and using the smart block stand-in, I wonder if this could be an edge against Chrome? While the Google team can push the envelope, pay for whatever is necessary, and add their own standards (such as AMP, though that may be going away IIRC), they're likely stuck waiting on trackers just like Firefox was (on non-AMP pages).
- oktoberpaard 6y agoI believe that the comparison was between blocking the tracking script with and without a stand-in.
- jefftk 6y agoYes: "Previously (left), the website tiny.cloud had poor loading performance in Private Browsing windows in Firefox because of an incompatibility with strong Tracking Protection. With SmartBlock (right), the website loads properly again, while you are still fully protected from trackers found on the page."