4 ms·
Ddg is usually adequate for my needs, but especially with code related searches, I often have to fall back to google. I’m glad ddg exists, and it’s nice to see
by blunte 6y ago
Ddg is usually adequate for my needs, but especially with code related searches, I often have to fall back to google.
I’m glad ddg exists, and it’s nice to see them improving over time.
- skinkestek 6y agoI have this workflow: - use DDG - if I can't find it, attach !g to my query and be instantly on Google - either confirm Google can't find it either - or found it this way DDG get important data to improve their technology, I avoid being tracked most of the time and I get the same results for the cost of a few seconds here and there. Yes, DDG isn't exactly amazing for anyone who used Google before 2009, but neither is the "Google" lookalike we see today ;-)
- mantap 6y agoYou can use !s instead of !g and you get the google results through startpage without going to google directly.
- skinkestek 6y agoGood point! I guess !g is just a old habit that I should upgrade now.