3 ms·
I'm using ddg on all my devices for ~2 or 3 years now, and it is fine by my standards. YMMV, of course.
by Andrew_nenakhov 6y ago
I'm using ddg on all my devices for ~2 or 3 years now, and it is fine by my standards. YMMV, of course.
- blunte 6y agoDdg is usually adequate for my needs, but especially with code related searches, I often have to fall back to google. I’m glad ddg exists, and it’s nice to see them improving over time.
- skinkestek 6y agoI have this workflow: - use DDG - if I can't find it, attach !g to my query and be instantly on Google - either confirm Google can't find it either - or found it this way DDG get important data to improve their technology, I avoid being tracked most of the time and I get the same results for the cost of a few seconds here and there. Yes, DDG isn't exactly amazing for anyone who used Google before 2009, but neither is the "Google" lookalike we see today ;-)
- mantap 6y agoYou can use !s instead of !g and you get the google results through startpage without going to google directly.
- skinkestek 6y agoGood point! I guess !g is just a old habit that I should upgrade now.