3 ms·
> I am always really wary about google and their products. People might say that enterprise services are different, and it's different from free services where
by jeppesen-io 6y ago
> I am always really wary about google and their products. People might say that enterprise services are different, and it's different from free services where if you're not paying you can't expect anything, but there's been paid services by google that have been absolutely terrible like stadia
GCP is a major player in the cloud space. Number 3 last I looked. I fail to see how that compares to Stadia, an expensive experiment that may or may not succeed. Do we judge AWS on Amazon Prime Video's mediocre service? I sure hope not. Let's be clear - GPC is not an experiment. It has massive capital backing
> At the very least the marketing for gcp could make it clearer what exactly it's offering that's better: price, ease of management, etc.
Okay, but you (I assume) can read beyond marketing. Marketing should not influence your decision (very much)
> Because nobody is going to get fired for choosing AWS so there has to be a real clear incentive other than some small technical improvements that don't matter at scale.
I don't use GCP but there are many clear advantages. If those do not help your biz case, fine, move on. But if you can't see the advantages, read more
- edoceo 6y agoYou're talking past each other with the word "marketing". One of you means "messaging and product positioning detail" and the other means "biz-speak drivel"