3 ms·
No question it would not make sense in that original 4K or even 8K BASIC, but MS produced BASICs with much larger memory budget and the matrix ops never appeare
by tasty_freeze 6y ago
No question it would not make sense in that original 4K or even 8K BASIC, but MS produced BASICs with much larger memory budget and the matrix ops never appeared (as far as I know).
- Someone 6y agoThey added tons of stuff that made business sense to them. Apparently, matrices as built-in types didn’t. Nowadays, the language is powerful enough to implement them as a library (e.g. https://www.freevbcode.com/ShowCode.asp?ID=3682 https://www.freevbcode.com/ShowCode.asp?ID=3682. Operator overloading became possible at some time, too. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/visual-basic/programming-guide/language-features/procedures/how-to-define-an-operator https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/visual-basic/program...) It’s not as if they don’t know matrices exist. Excel has matrix operations (https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/mmult-function-40593ed7-a3cd-4b6b-b9a3-e4ad3c7245eb https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/mmult-function-40...)