If I'm reading this correctly your issue was not that he was mischaracterized as those things, but that rightly naming him those things is mean? What a soggy re

If I'm reading this correctly your issue was not that he was mischaracterized as those things, but that rightly naming him those things is mean? What a soggy rebuttal. If its slanderous, show us. If it's not slander it's true, and it's not "mean" to label an abuser so. The linked letter puts forward proof. Are you refuting that wholesale?