3 ms·
Thanks for the well thought out reply. So IIUC it's (probably) not that this result is the One True Answer in itself, but rather a potential chink in the armor
by shmageggy 6y ago
Thanks for the well thought out reply. So IIUC it's (probably) not that this result is the One True Answer in itself, but rather a potential chink in the armor that tells us where to pry.
- ISL 6y agoYes. There are well-known places where we think the armor might be weak and we're trying all of them roughly equally. The moment someone finds an actual hole in the armor, a lot of people will jump in and hammer on that one in particular. The key properties of the weak points are: a) We have to be able to hit it there in a meaningful way b) Anywhere that we expend millions of dollars and oodles of people-years of work to look for holes, we have to be capable of verifying that a possible-hole is an actual-hole. This particular anomaly scores pretty well on b). If they have a clean signal there, then it is a pretty big deal.