> Can someone explain to me how this is not cancel culture? If the definition of the nebulous concept of 'cancel culture' is so broad as to encompass disassoci

> Can someone explain to me how this is not cancel culture? If the definition of the nebulous concept of 'cancel culture' is so broad as to encompass disassociating ourselves from a person we consider heinous, and encouraging others to do the same, then I'm not sure there's any value in the concept to begin with. It's hard to argue that we should all limit how we use our freedom of association so that someone else may occupy a position that they are not entitled to.