This entire article is a lie: >>But lawyers for Powell argued her false statements about election fraud in the months preceding the Capitol insurrection were u

This entire article is a lie: >>But lawyers for Powell argued her false statements about election fraud in the months preceding the Capitol insurrection were unmistakably not presented as true facts. “It was clear to reasonable persons that Powell’s claims were her opinions and legal theories on a matter of utmost public concern,” her legal motion says. “Those members of the public who were interested in the controversy were free to, and did, review that evidence and reached their own conclusions – or awaited resolution of the matter by the courts before making up their minds.” Where did her lawyers say anything about her statements being false? Their argument is that they were expressions of opinion, a standard defence in defamation suits.