4 ms·

I like Ruby, too. But Crystal is like Ruby, and better in many regards. Performance is a huge issue with any computational intensive tasks. Crystal's static typ

I like Ruby, too. But Crystal is like Ruby, and better in many regards. Performance is a huge issue with any computational intensive tasks. Crystal's static typing also avoids many simple errors you would only catch in Ruby with an extensive spec suite for many edge cases.

vinceguidry 6y ago
This is a Crystal discussion, and I hate it when Crystal people show up in Ruby discussions and talk crap about Ruby so I won't argue against you, other than to say that Crystal is only like Ruby in that it's syntax is superficially similar.