3 ms·
Iny my experience, Render.com is a better (at least cheaper) Heroku plus it handles distributed Elixir really easily.
by cpursley 6y ago
Iny my experience, Render.com is a better (at least cheaper) Heroku plus it handles distributed Elixir really easily.
- dosethree 6y agoDoes heroku not handle distributed elixir? What does that even entail
- mrkurt 6y agoYou need private networking or the Erlang nodes can't talk to each other.
- jrochkind1 6y agoNice, I hadn't heard of them, but does look interesting, I'll add it to the list to check out at some point. Going through the docs just a bit, I see some things have you using docker manually, like "Deploy Persistent Redis with Docker" -- that's not necessarily a barrier, but it is already less simple/abstracted than heroku. But still might be worth it. I don't know how to keep up current awareness of this stuff, what the companies/options are. How do you?
- anurag 6y ago(Render founder) the current Redis setup is one-click and zero maintenance, but we're also planning to launch a fully managed Redis later this year.
- anurag 6y agoThanks for the plug! Here's our (admittedly biased) Render vs Heroku comparison: we're not just cheaper; we're a better fit for how applications are built today. https://render.com/render-vs-heroku-comparison https://render.com/render-vs-heroku-comparison