5 ms·
I believe you are underestimating the importance of Biden refusing to speak with the Crown Prince as he called world leaders as his term began. It might seem j
by sunstone 6y ago
I believe you are underestimating the importance of Biden refusing to speak with the Crown Prince as he called world leaders as his term began. It might seem just symbolic but it's much more than that.
- rurp 6y agoCan you elaborate on that? I'm not doubting you, It's just not obvious to me why it's a big deal rather than a token gesture.
- recuter 6y agoYeah, it is Biden pandering to a domestic audience who will forget all about this in a few years. The spice must flow.
- mercutio2 6y agoWhat spice? The US is a net exporter of oil, these days.
- pengaru 6y agoIf the spice doesn't flow, Saudi Arabia can't afford US weapons. Also the oil dependency graph can change during resource-intensive conflicts.
- ic0n0cl4st 6y agoI always thought of America as the Harkonnens, but now that you said it I realize that we are the Imperium, OPEC is CHOAM and Saudi Arabia are the Harkonnens.
- colpabar 6y agoIt's a reference to the 1984 movie Dune. I don't remember the exact details, but it's very similar to oil, in that it's a valuable natural resource that different factions go to war over.
- tialaramex 6y agoThe fictional Spice (Melange) is used by ordinary rich people to live longer. More importantly since their culture has rejected the use of AI they use much larger amounts of Spice to give the Guild Navigators sufficient foresight to be able to pilot Highliners through space-time, enabling the empire to cover a number of star systems.
- teddyh 6y agoNote: It’s “Heighliner”, not “Highliner”.
- etiam 6y agoOr a reference to the 1965 novel Dune, if you're lucky.
- mercutio2 6y agoGiven that the phrase doesn't appear anywhere in Frank Herbert's novels (the horrible dumpster fires by his son may have it, but I couldn't say), it's certainly a Lynch reference. But my question wasn't what "spice" means, I assumed everyone on Hacker News knows that. I was asking why Saudi spice is particularly relevant to US interests, when we're a net exporter of said spice. It was admittedly a bit tongue in cheek; dramatically reduced Saudi supplies would impact energy markets in a bunch of second and third order ways we might not like. But that doesn't mean we have to keep selling them guns.
- rhizome 6y agoIt's been almost a few years already, which few were you thinking of?
- rhizome 6y agoAnd with England you call the Queen, not William.