3 ms·
I keep hearing this argument but I don't understand it. What does not having security patches do? I am using an HTC Desire 826 from 2016 running Android 6, whi
by M277 6y ago
I keep hearing this argument but I don't understand it. What does not having security patches do?
I am using an HTC Desire 826 from 2016 running Android 6, while my father is using a Galaxy Note 3 Neo running Android 4.3.
I personally don't have much issues with regards to not having security patches.. the phone itself does most of what I want, although I am having issues with other things unrelated to security patches -- it's getting a bit sluggish, the 16GB storage does get annoying, and the battery barely lasts two hours of web browsing. Also, it no longer accepts SIM cards for whatever reason. But it's not a big deal to warrant spending money (I don't get called at all and I do have a dumb phone that I go out with for emergencies. Besides, I no longer get annoying messages and calls from my carrier)
Similarly, my father's is doing alright, and the issues he is facing are unrelated to security patches -- many apps don't support Android versions older than 6.. some of them are essential things like Google stuff. YouTube and Gmail for instance outright don't work, and Chrome occasionally brings up messages along the lines of "Please update your Chrome version". But nothing is caused by not having security patches.
What am I missing? This is a genuine question.
- yjftsjthsd-h 6y agoThat you have not noticed problems as a result of not having security problems doesn't mean that there aren't problems, and doesn't mean that there won't be problems. Maybe you've lucked out and haven't actually gotten malware yet, and maybe tomorrow you open your phone to a ransomware message, or maybe you've had spyware for 3 months and just not noticed.
- M277 6y agoGood point, but wouldn't there have been more pressure on the OEMs to increase security patch support if this were a widespread issue? Because most do 2 - 3 years.