> I don't see how that proves your point After calling me "delusional" I'll not feel as bad pointing out that if you can't understand why I've included in my a

> I don't see how that proves your point After calling me "delusional" I'll not feel as bad pointing out that if you can't understand why I've included in my argument something that is "basically the opposite of what you want" then you haven't understood my argument at all. Perhaps try reading it again and, instead of taking issue with it prematurely, try to understand it first. That's probably a good general guideline for you. I'm out.