How do you know we're not already at that tipping point, if not there than in other forms of influencer 'culture'? Of course you're right, but I'll tell you wh

How do you know we're not already at that tipping point, if not there than in other forms of influencer 'culture'? Of course you're right, but I'll tell you what next. Redefine 'dominate'. All that has happened is we've shown mass media, mass popularity, is better suited to the unreal. Humans need not apply here. 'Mass' anything, then gets less interesting as it is self-evidently a dead-end. And not 'everybody', but significant numbers of people, pursue something else, perhaps things that are unlikeable in an interesting way. The differences will always be less 'addictive' than the 'mass' stuff, but will overperform in other, definable ways. As someone who has deleted Twitter and Facebook I think I'm correct in this notion that the most addictive, most 'mass' media sources are not 'good' in any normal human sense other than manipulation of that very instinct in all its forms…