4 ms·
The person you're responding to doesn't seem to place moral considerations high on his list, in general.
by mercer 6y ago
The person you're responding to doesn't seem to place moral considerations high on his list, in general.
- gambiting 6y agoI don't know why you'd make such an assumption about me, please expand. I think in general all of my comments on this thread have been horribly misunderstood - I was just trying to say that if the company was scummy, instead of paying him the 250k fee, they probably could have sued him instead. I'm not saying that should have done, I'm not saying it would have been the right thing to do, that he deserved it.....literally nothing of the sort. Just pointing out that the company could have made an argument against him in court. As many other people pointed out to me, it would have almost certainly failed. But I don't understand how you can deduct where moral considerations are on my priority list from this?