2 ms·
More in depth, but plain English summary from the researchers here: https://theconversation.com/amp/evidence-of-brand-new-physics-at-cern-why-were-cautiously-o
by mellosouls 6y ago
More in depth, but plain English summary from the researchers here:
https://theconversation.com/amp/evidence-of-brand-new-physics-at-cern-why-were-cautiously-optimistic-about-our-new-findings-157464 https://theconversation.com/amp/evidence-of-brand-new-physic...
- xenophonf 6y agoNon-AMP link: https://theconversation.com/evidence-of-brand-new-physics-at-cern-why-were-cautiously-optimistic-about-our-new-findings-157464 https://theconversation.com/evidence-of-brand-new-physics-at...
- mellosouls 6y agoYeah I normally take it out, just forgot this time. I don't mind it myself, but try and default to neutral.
- random5634 6y agoThis is interesting - normally AMP is great and I'm (generally) a fan of it. But somehow they messed up AMP here - I've not seen that before. The AMP page is really poor (third party blocking, time to paint, even JANK is here - shift after load). The non AMP page is 1.4MB and 45 requests, the AMP page is 400KB and 16 requests - normally this means AMP just blows everything out of the water (despite HN hate). Something is messed up here that AMP is so poor, initial server response is terrible.