2 ms·
I thought Japanese researchers had already replicated the "anomalous heat generation" in LENR. https://asiatimes.com/2019/11/cold-fusion-japan-takes-the-lead/ h
by lenkite 6y ago
I thought Japanese researchers had already replicated the "anomalous heat generation" in LENR. https://asiatimes.com/2019/11/cold-fusion-japan-takes-the-lead/ https://asiatimes.com/2019/11/cold-fusion-japan-takes-the-le...
Why is this still considered BS if independent research teams have reproduced this ?
- simonh 6y agoIt's important to distinguish between current actual results from labs working very carefully and methodically and turning up interesting anomalous results, and the original claims made by F&P. Yes there is interesting physics here and there's a lot we don't know about the behaviour of hydrogen and deuterium in dense metallic crystal lattices. Who knows, that behaviour might even have something to do with fusion. That's separate from what F&P were claiming 30 years ago. They claimed to have produced 'tremendous heat' and to have detected evidence of fusion (gamma rays and fusion products). They couldn't replicate the heat measurements, there were experimental errors that mean we can't know if they had generated excess heat at all, and they were simply mistaken that the evidence they had gathered indicated fusion. Two things can both be true at the same time. These new experiments might indicate heat generation and might indicate fusion, and the F&P experiments demonstrated none of those things. Those are not contradictory statements. Heck, F&P might even have stimulated fusion in their experiments. It's impossible to prove a negative. The point is they didn't demonstrate that at all.