26 ms·
What you're suggesting is impossible. >the government making it illegal to run hacking tools like "tor" Do you think that there is nothing illegal that happen
by blhack 15y ago
What you're suggesting is impossible.
>the government making it illegal to run hacking tools like "tor"
Do you think that there is nothing illegal that happens on the internet now? How long was it illegal to export encryption? How many people actually cared?
>forcing your ISP to record any use of such and block you off the internet
The encryption standards that we all use are the same encryption standards that are recommended by the NSA. Unless my ISP knows something that the rest of the world doesn't, it's functionally impossible for them to see what I'm doing if I'm either using tor, or tunneling out of the country on the back of a VPN.
Tor was invented by the NSA, by the way, for exactly this purpose.
Look at what Iran/Egypt/etc have done to try and crack down on internet usage. Or even China. Look at how successful that has been.
(It has been a failure)
- pyre 15y ago> How long was it illegal to export encryption? How many > people actually cared? The people that actually crossed borders to develop crypto software outside of the USA. edit: change to past tense
- corin_ 15y agoTaking Egypt as an example, their attempt was technically pretty successful. The problem that government had was political, and that was because it was a dictator enforcing it on his people without being able to convince the people that it was the right thing to do. If the US Government were to bring it in as anti-terrorism laws, while some people wouldn't like it, it wouldn't cause riots on the streets and firefights between the army and the citizens. Will the US try and do this? I doubt it. If they tried, would political opposition prevent them from getting it done? I think and hope so. But the point is that if it did happen, it wouldn't happen in the same way as Egypt, and so wouldn't face the same reaction. In Egypt, action preceded debate. In the US, if it ever happened, by that time the chance to prevent it would have been lost.
- mindstab 15y agoDepends on your definition of successful. But I consider it a failure for the people (in the case of China) when the government has a list of people they consider dissidents and when those middle eastern rebellions kicked off they just preemptively arrested them all. I don't know how that list was generated, but if tor usage was enough to get you on well then... Yes tor was made to hide what you are doing, but if using tor alone is enough to cast suspicion or guilt on you then what?
- a3_nm 15y agoWas Tor actually invented by the NSA? I didn't manage to find any sources for that, could you provide one?
- blhack 15y agoActually, I'll admit that I can't either. I may be wrong about this, and it may have just been a rumor that sounded about right (NSA has made several contributions to the cryptography community)
- ontoillogical 15y agoNot the NSA, it came from the Navy. See here: http://www.onion-router.net/ http://www.onion-router.net/
- niels_olson 15y ago> Tor was invented by the NSA Actually, Paul Syverson, Roger Dingledine, and Nick Mathewson orginated Tor, and Dr Syverson did the original onion routing work at the Naval Research Lab. https://www.torproject.org/about/corepeople.html.en https://www.torproject.org/about/corepeople.html.en I don't recall seeing "NSA" anywhere on any their resumes, in their papers, etc. Syverson has made it pretty clear Tor is not so good for serious security, eg, trying to evade nation-states. Evading nation-states is what PGP is for. Fundamentally, if you want a pizza, the pizza delivery guy has to know your address, no matter how many intermediate stops he makes. Also, have you used Tor? Speed is a major issue.