5 ms·
Anyone want to go conspiracy theory with me and wonder if some government agency wants more power to go after groups like anonymous and wikileaks and so are doi
by mindstab 15y ago
Anyone want to go conspiracy theory with me and wonder if some government agency wants more power to go after groups like anonymous and wikileaks and so are doing this themselves to get both people and the rest of government on board to give them more broad and exciting new powers (at our expense) to go after the real groups?
- rbanffy 15y agoThat would certainly explain how they managed to piss off so many people and still remain undetected.
- mindstab 15y agopublic broadcaster one day government the next game servers the next trying to hit every demographic :/
- rbanffy 15y agoAnyone willing to suggest something we could do? Because the title on the top of this site will get very unpopular in the next couple weeks.
- daeken 15y agoPromote security. Discuss secure coding techniques, perform security analysis on software (and closed-source services with bug bounty programs!), make sure your own projects/products are secure, and generally just keep security -- not just attacks -- in the limelight.
- blhack 15y agoI keep hearing this conspiracy theory pop up in almost every thread both here and on reddit about lulzsec's activities. Can somebody give me a "worst case" scenario for a government crackdown on the internet? What's to stop me from running tor? From VPNing out of the country myself? How would this alleged crackdown affect me? And are you all new to the internet? Hacker groups like this have been around since...ever. I will admit that their publicity seems to have been waning in the last 5-6 years, but we're not really seeing anything new here. The only new thing about it is that this time it's happening on twitter. This isn't a government cover-up. This isn't a conspiracy. It's one or several nerds doing what most nerds love to do: cause trouble. It's just that this time, it's happening on a much more public forum.
- mindstab 15y agoWhat's to stop you? the government making it illegal to run hacking tools like "tor" (see the silk road/bitcoin post on HN from earlier) etc illegal and forcing your ISP to record any use of such and block you off the internet (see france's 3 strikes, you as a person are not allowed on the internet law) and report you and then possibly criminally prosecute you as well.
- blhack 15y agoWhat you're suggesting is impossible. >the government making it illegal to run hacking tools like "tor" Do you think that there is nothing illegal that happens on the internet now? How long was it illegal to export encryption? How many people actually cared? >forcing your ISP to record any use of such and block you off the internet The encryption standards that we all use are the same encryption standards that are recommended by the NSA. Unless my ISP knows something that the rest of the world doesn't, it's functionally impossible for them to see what I'm doing if I'm either using tor, or tunneling out of the country on the back of a VPN. Tor was invented by the NSA, by the way, for exactly this purpose. Look at what Iran/Egypt/etc have done to try and crack down on internet usage. Or even China. Look at how successful that has been. (It has been a failure)
- pyre 15y ago> How long was it illegal to export encryption? How many > people actually cared? The people that actually crossed borders to develop crypto software outside of the USA. edit: change to past tense
- corin_ 15y agoTaking Egypt as an example, their attempt was technically pretty successful. The problem that government had was political, and that was because it was a dictator enforcing it on his people without being able to convince the people that it was the right thing to do. If the US Government were to bring it in as anti-terrorism laws, while some people wouldn't like it, it wouldn't cause riots on the streets and firefights between the army and the citizens. Will the US try and do this? I doubt it. If they tried, would political opposition prevent them from getting it done? I think and hope so. But the point is that if it did happen, it wouldn't happen in the same way as Egypt, and so wouldn't face the same reaction. In Egypt, action preceded debate. In the US, if it ever happened, by that time the chance to prevent it would have been lost.