5 ms·
In most states and federally, one party consenting to a recording is sufficient, so in those cases it doesn't matter that you, the visitor, give consent. In st
by fny 6y ago
In most states and federally, one party consenting to a recording is sufficient, so in those cases it doesn't matter that you, the visitor, give consent.
In states with two party consent laws, I think you're required to have signage or other explicit message that declares recording is in progress (this may be different for residential properties): a Ring logo may not be sufficient.
- lotsofpulp 6y agoThere’s usually an option to not record audio in the software because in the states that require consent of all parties, audio recording is usually still not allowed without explicit consent of everyone in a non public location even if a notice is placed.
- nerdponx 6y agoWhat about a 3rd party? You give consent to the homeowner, but do you also give consent to Amazon?
- thaumasiotes 6y agoOne party is sufficient. Whether you give consent -- to anyone -- doesn't matter. Your interlocutor is free to consent anyway.
- LinuxBender 6y agoAFAIK there is only one state with single party consent.
- kube-system 6y agoFWIW: https://recordinglaw.com/party-two-party-consent-states/ https://recordinglaw.com/party-two-party-consent-states/