5 ms·
Very true. Most people don't know but the most controversial weapons that Israel has used in recent years, such as the cluster bombs dropped in Southern Lebano
by imjustatechguy 15y ago
Very true.
Most people don't know but the most controversial weapons that Israel has used in recent years, such as the cluster bombs dropped in Southern Lebanon [1] and the white phosphorous used in the Gaza Strip [2][3] were both made by the US and given to Israel through the US Military Aid program.
[1] http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/5299938.stm http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/5299938.stm
[2] http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article5575070.ece http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/arti...
- tkahn6 15y ago> and the white phosphorous used in the Gaza Strip [2] were both made by the US and given to Israel through the US Military Aid program. Also very true. And it should be noted that WP usage is legal under international law provided that it is used as a smokescreen and not a weapon [1]. And the reason it is provided by America is because it is used by NATO. 1. http://www.gonzagajil.org/content/view/194/26/ http://www.gonzagajil.org/content/view/194/26/
- imjustatechguy 15y agoThe problem with WP was the way it was used in Gaza: http://www.amnesty.org/en/news-and-updates/news/israeli-armys-use-white-phosphorus-gaza-clear-undeniable-20090119 http://www.amnesty.org/en/news-and-updates/news/israeli-army...
- tkahn6 15y agoYes forgive me if don't trust Amnesty international on Israel (or any Western country for that matter) [1]. Also, WP is legal when used in a civilian area if that's where the battlefield is (Israel did not choose to fight in an urban area, Hamas did). See my same link above. 1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Amnesty_International http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Amnesty_Internatio...