2 ms·
> Misinformation. from the article you linked to: > Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated viru
by tomp 6y ago
> Misinformation.
from the article you linked to:
> Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus.
You're the one spreading FUD, intentionally misinterpreting the original article and making up a fake argument that "lab leak" hypothesis somehow contradicts "natural origin" and implies that the virus was "designed". (If I understand the article correctly, "purposefully manipulated" means "genetically manipulated", not "gain of function".) Flagged.
- tbenst 6y agoIf you’re open hearing new information and revising your position, please consider listening to the podcast from Nature that I linked to in another comment. It’s not controversial nor misleading to say that [edit: much of] the scientific community views the “lab leak” hypothesis as a conspiracy theory. The main segment starts around 6:30. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-00599-7 https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-00599-7 Edit: wanted to highlight that, while the Lancet and other publications have highlighted the mainstream views that “lab leak” is a conspiracy theory, that there is a prominent minority of scientists that disagree: https://undark.org/2021/03/17/lab-leak-science-lost-in-politics/ https://undark.org/2021/03/17/lab-leak-science-lost-in-polit...
- hntrader 6y agoWell, it literally is a conspiracy theory. Whether it's a true or false conspiracy theory is what's being discussed.