> is yet to face consequences Aside from the destruction of her career (justified), it is extremely unlikely that she won't face very serious consequences give

> is yet to face consequences Aside from the destruction of her career (justified), it is extremely unlikely that she won't face very serious consequences given the mountain of evidence. It's also strange that you think "consequences" are not meaningful if they do not include jail time. Non-violent offenders spending time in jail is not the mark of a healthy society. Financial punishments, travel restrictions, restitution, community service, probationary requirements, future joblessness - all of these are "real" punishments. It is absolutely still a deterrent to anyone thinking of "copy-cat" her failure. She will likely not emerge from this with anything other than personal bankruptcy, and ongoing non-disposable restitution. What is the point of incarceration of non-violent offenders? Let the legal system work before you lay judgement on it. It is intentionally slow in order to be deliberate and consistent. I don't subscribe to the mob-mentality that non-violent white collar offenders deserve long jail sentences.