3 ms·
I'm surprised it took this long, and it's still not completely gone. I've never understood the history of why http referer exists (original intent) or why the u
by aimor 6y ago
I'm surprised it took this long, and it's still not completely gone. I've never understood the history of why http referer exists (original intent) or why the user would benefit from sharing it.
- jameshart 6y agoThe original HTTP specification really didn’t think of the web as an adversarial environment. The RFC that specified the ‘referer’ header [1] described it as having the following purpose: [Referer]... allows the client to specify, for the server's benefit, the address (URI) of the resource from which the Request-URI was obtained. This allows a server to generate lists of back-links to resources for interest, logging, optimized caching, etc. It also allows obsolete or mistyped links to be traced for maintenance. The idea of how a user benefits from sharing it was that it would help the webmasters upon whom they were reliant to do a better job of curating their websites. It clearly expects a benevolent relationship between the owner of the linked site, the host of the link, and the user. Idealistic, sure, but understandable in a collaborative, academic context. [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1945#section-10.13 https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1945#section-10.13