> I have seen that message distilled down into "Go is simple to read." I think the two are related, directly. However in my experience i don't even agree with

> I have seen that message distilled down into "Go is simple to read." I think the two are related, directly. However in my experience i don't even agree with Pike. Go is not easy to read. Yes, a single small function in Go is much easier to read (perhaps) than X lang. However Go requires a huge (brain)memory table to remember everything, because it spreads logic out. So you have to remember X function, scroll up, look at Y function remembering how it interacts with X, etcetc. > Whether or not it is successful in that is another topic for another day. I guess i bikeshedded, sorry :s