3 ms·
Your bicubic image looks different to my bicubic images. Starting with http://www.johncostella.com/magic/small.png http://www.johncostella.com/magic/small.png
by chronogram 6y ago
Your bicubic image looks different to my bicubic images.
Starting with http://www.johncostella.com/magic/small.png http://www.johncostella.com/magic/small.png when doubling 3 times I get this result in Photoshop CS2 https://i.ibb.co/9tCLPGS/PSCS2triple.png https://i.ibb.co/9tCLPGS/PSCS2triple.png and when doubling 3 times in GIMP’s cubic the result is https://i.ibb.co/p2b0Trq/GIMPtriple.png https://i.ibb.co/p2b0Trq/GIMPtriple.png
This is the result when using GIMP to go straight from 57x43 to 456x344: https://i.ibb.co/r0SXVY2/GIMpstraight.png https://i.ibb.co/r0SXVY2/GIMpstraight.png and Photoshop CS2: https://i.ibb.co/Sn1xt3Y/PSCS2straight.png https://i.ibb.co/Sn1xt3Y/PSCS2straight.png
Which one is the correct representative of the bicubic filter?
- johncostella 6y agoI generated bicubic and Lanczos versions in 2006. It was stated that the Lanczos one evidently came from a version of GIMP that was buggy, so I removed it a long time back. The bicubic is still there from that era. If it's wrong, I will have to redo that part of the page. The Lanczos images in the paper should be correct.