3 ms·
It's more of the fact that S3 is expensive for storing lots of data, isn't it? I think tarsnap charges only a small margin on top of S3.
by nvarsj 6y ago
It's more of the fact that S3 is expensive for storing lots of data, isn't it? I think tarsnap charges only a small margin on top of S3.
- floatboth 6y agoAnd tarsnap possibly uses the most expensive tier of S3: > the original version, which can survive the loss of 2 datacenters, not the "reduced redundancy" version which can only survive the loss of a single datacenter These days, there's not just reduced redundancy, but also infrequent access, which seems better for backups…