4 ms·

A comment above indicates two people got identical test result reports with a very long report. This seems unlikely unless either: - the system made specific p

A comment above indicates two people got identical test result reports with a very long report. This seems unlikely unless either: - the system made specific predictions with very little data such that two people could get the same prediction and report simply bc they shared a few poop attributes that were key in the prediction (which would imply a very very bad model) Or - the reports were fake Can you speak to this?

tttioo12345 6y ago
Your questions assume the samples were tracked and assigned to the correct reports. Its much more likely that both samples were processed, and a software bug assigned them the same output. You have to understand the company wasn't organized around results, it was organized around the appearance of results. The employees were earnest and motivated to do the right thing, so the samples were likely processed, but something like a bug in the handoff or assignment of data is unlikely to be caught. Incorrectly assigned data isn't important when the real goal is to give the appearance of success.