3 ms·
>"Plasmonics refers to the generation, detection, and manipulation of signals at optical frequencies along metal-dielectric interfaces in the nanometer scale.[1
by peter_d_sherman 6y ago
>"Plasmonics refers to the generation, detection, and manipulation of signals at optical frequencies along metal-dielectric interfaces in the nanometer scale.[1]"
So, why is Plasmonics so important?
?
Well, here's a part answer to that question:
"Ten years of spasers and plasmonic nanolasers"
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41377-020-0319-7 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41377-020-0319-7
>"Historically, lasers were heralded for their monochromaticity, high intensity, and low beam divergence; however, today, stimulated emission is utilized as a tool that offers
exquisite control to engineer light fields with well-defined frequencies, statistical properties, polarizations, and spatial profiles.
The range of applications is vast.
Miniaturization has always been a persistent topic of research in photonics; just 2 years after Maiman’s first laser [3], semiconductor lasers [6] emerged, which were orders of magnitude smaller.
Technologically, semiconductor lasers are naturally more compact, but with the advent of
heterostructures
[7], they also became able to operate at lower power under electrical injection, even under battery power. As transistor scaling and integration set in motion the microelectronics and computer revolutions, the integration of microelectronics with photonics was long perceived to be unavoidable [8].
When the smallest dimensions of lasers eventually reached wavelength scales
in the 1990s (see, e.g., ref. 9), they were still several orders of magnitude larger than transistors.
However, it was realized that micro- and nanoscale
optical resonators
could be utilized to control spontaneous emission. From this paradigm, spontaneous emission control emerged as a modern topic of research in the field of nanolasers.
By the turn of the millennium,
optically pumped photonic crystal (PC)
nanolasers were among the smallest devices [10]. Other forms of small lasers soon followed starting in the early 2000s [11], such as nanowire lasers [12,13,14,15,16].
However, the quest to reduce the resonator size made it extremely difficult to produce such small PC lasers operating under electrical injection. Metal contacts that closely approached the cavity inevitably introduced both scattering and absorption losses. Complications of poor heat conduction and low mechanical stability also arose as these devices were constructed from thin suspended membranes of semiconductor material. Meanwhile, many studies on metallic waveguides were indicating the possibility of confinement beyond the wavelength range of light [17,18,19,20,21,22,23].
As such approaches introduced metallic loss, integrated gain strategies were also devised to prolong the propagation of light [24,25,26]. The final ingredient, and the key to effectively scaling down the physical size of lasers, was the emergence of
metal-based cavities operating in dielectric modes
[27] or plasmonic modes in 2007 [28]. Such devices embraced the capability of metals to provide all of the requirements for any laser [29,30,31,32]: optical confinement, feedback, electrical contacts, and thermal management [33,34,35,36].
Such approaches relied on metals to support surface electromagnetic waves that used electron oscillations to promote optical confinement.
It was Bergman and Stockman [33] who first realized in 2003 that these
surface plasmon waves could also be amplified by stimulated emission.
Thus, the concept of the spaser
(an acronym for
surface plasmon amplification by stimulated emission of radiation
) was born.
This realization provoked considerable interest due to the predicted ability of such a new device to generate coherent plasmonic fields, along with the prospective applications of this capability.
Ten years ago, three teams [34,35,36] independently demonstrated the first plasmonic nanolasers, or spasers, from different perspectives and with different motivations (Fig. 1). These plasmonic nanolasers are extremely compact coherent light sources with ultrafast dynamics and a broad palette of promising applications [8,37]"
- peter_d_sherman 6y agoPDS: Also, some of my own random thoughts: Compare the idea of a laser (a resonating cavity, mirrors) at whatever scale -- with the idea of phase cancellation in sound... See, in the most generic description of a laser possible, there are two mirrors, one fully silvered, one half silvered, and as a result of continuing to add light energy into this cavity, by bouncing back and forth between both mirrors enough times, the light, which is "chaotically ordered" (for lack of a better term) on input, now becomes ordered (in a straight line) and coherent on output... Well, it might be that that could be done to any wavefront in classical physics -- but the thing is, for any type of wavefront in classical physics, you need a resonating cavity (the equivalent of the two mirrors), some way to pump energy into that cavity, and enough energy to get it past a certain threshold necessary to create coherency in the output... (Side thought: There may be some relationship wtih the discrete, non-contiguous energy levels of electrons in an atom's shells here, but that's a side discussion...) And then of course there are the thermal management issues that might arise when doing that... But that's not the point! Point is, in theory, it should be doable to any wave type in classical physics, be it sound, light, air, waves in the electromagnetic spectrum, etc., etc. And, it should also be doable at any level of the nano scale too, and that spacers/the use of surface plasmons exist and work -- could be thought of as a hint -- that this might be possible on all levels of matter someday (since matter/atoms/subparticles/substructures contain waves/energy at many levels...) What's one possible future application of all of this, if you can get all of that to work? Well, if you can A) Put a nano laser beam generator on a substrate; B) Create the substrate such that parts of it are made out of CD/DVD/Blu-Ray material; Then, in theory, the material can "write" to itself, that is, change its own state at the nanoscale. Now, if transistors could be made out of that CD/DVD/Blu-Ray material (or whatever other substrate future scientists would invent), then, if it could all be carefully orchestrated, what the end result would be is a "chip foundry" on a single chip... Basically, the chip (or crystal, or other substrate) basically "knows enough" about the relationships between matter, energy, space, chemistry and transistors -- to "write" a new transistorized (electrical or light) entity, to "create" a new microchip or "intelligent crystal", or what-have-you (describe it as you will...) But anyway, that would be one future application... We'll call it an "Atlantean Crystal" (for lack of a better term!) -- and leave it at that...