3 ms·
To me having a particularly heavy rocket to be man-rated is like stepping into Shuttle problems again. That is, trying to make a system both very safe and havin
by avmich 6y ago
To me having a particularly heavy rocket to be man-rated is like stepping into Shuttle problems again. That is, trying to make a system both very safe and having a large mass payloads.
Why to have a larger than necessary rocket, which has additional problems with just getting stuff to orbit - FH is more complex than F9 - to carry humans, who requires extra care?
Much better, from the point of safety, is to have a moderate-sized launcher human rated and specializing in bringing humans safely to orbit. After that it's much safer to use whatever means of travel are brought to space by any other launchers, those with focus on economy and less on safety.
A counterargument is usually a variation of "it's very expensive", but that's just, roughly, because human life is valued cheap enough to allow for suboptimal choices.
- njarboe 6y agoThe new SpaceX Starship super heavy rocket will be the biggest rocket ever built and will carry humans. It probably won't get "man-rated" by NASA before the first humans start going up in it, but I don't know about the legal details of that possibility. SpaceX has a much high risk tolerance than NASA.