"But that's not an argument for doing nothing in response to someone who habitually offends people by accident." Well that really depends. Offense is sometimes

"But that's not an argument for doing nothing in response to someone who habitually offends people by accident." Well that really depends. Offense is sometimes a strategy employed by cynical actors to gain a political advantage. If I say that your posts are constantly offending me, what do you propose we do about that? There isn't a universally applicable rule here. This is also where the driving analogy breaks down. It's an easy trade-off to revoke someone's license if it means we can prevent death. But taking action to prevent subjective offense enters into a much more tenuous and debatable cost-benefit trade-off. What makes sense would come down to the details of the case.