> I work a low wage job and have seen co-workers go to pretty extreme lengths to avoid having to actually work. It's not as if employers don't have the means t

> I work a low wage job and have seen co-workers go to pretty extreme lengths to avoid having to actually work. It's not as if employers don't have the means to remediate this. If we cut down to it, there is a fundamental tension - the average employer wants maximum productivity for the least amount they can get away paying, and the average employee want the maximum possible income with the least amount of work. As a thought experiment, if your employer were to offer to reduce the length of your work-week while maintaining your current salary, what is the minimum number would you agree to? Zero is acceptable with no consequences.