> If you create a contract with intent to mislead people The guy didn't intend to mislead. He didn't even advertise the thing besides publishing it on the bloc

> If you create a contract with intent to mislead people The guy didn't intend to mislead. He didn't even advertise the thing besides publishing it on the blockchain. People bought it from him without auditing it. I sincerely hope this would be a difficult fraud case to make. The part of contract law you're citing is used to prevent e.g. predatory lending. I understand that it exists and what the precedent means, and I disagree that this is the same thing.