4 ms·
He did not remove the post, it's here: https://www.stallman.org/archives/2006-may-aug.html#05%20June%202006%20%28Dutch%20paedophiles%20form%20political%20party%
by stonogo 6y ago
He did not remove the post, it's here: https://www.stallman.org/archives/2006-may-aug.html#05%20June%202006%20%28Dutch%20paedophiles%20form%20political%20party%29 https://www.stallman.org/archives/2006-may-aug.html#05%20Jun...
And he didn't change his mind for over a decade, until he got in trouble for defending Marvin Minsky. I'm still not convinced his "updated opinion" would have happened without the scrutiny brought by the Epstein case.
- PurpleFoxy 6y agoLooks like he moved it to the archive section and dated it 2006 to show it is a very outdated view. Stallman is a very honest person and won’t try to hide the past. This comment used to be on one of the main info pages of the site.
- klyrs 6y agoThat quote has been at that url since 2006 https://web.archive.org/web/20060821211348/https://www.stallman.org/archives/2006-may-aug.html https://web.archive.org/web/20060821211348/https://www.stall...
- hda2 6y agoDid he redact his statement or not? A simple Yes or No will suffice.
- fooker 6y agoYes or No answers are only relevant when you admit yourself to be incapable of nuanced thought. Alternatively : “Have you stopped beating your wife?” A simple yes or no answer will suffice. :)
- anoonmoose 6y agoBoo, word games. His question has a yes or no answer, yours does not.