3 ms·
Or, it's a way to ensure that Wall Street gets a (large) cut of any investment made in a startup company by "normal" people. For example, let's take the words o
by coryrc 15y ago
Or, it's a way to ensure that Wall Street gets a (large) cut of any investment made in a startup company by "normal" people. For example, let's take the words of Seymour Cray:
The company raised $600,000 which was a huge amount of money in those days. It was done in a way that we can't do anymore. It was done on the street corner where people would stop by and say "Oh, what are you selling?" And you'd say "Oh, we're selling stock in a new company and its a dollar". And people bought a few dollars here and a few dollars there. There were no large investors in Control Data Corporation. I risked most of my assets. $5,000 dollars I invested which was a huge sum of money. It turned out to be a much bigger sum of money. It is interesting how our protective mechanisms over the years prevented such wild things from happening. Now it takes you six months to get approvals to do start any kind of an operation.
http://americanhistory.si.edu/collections/comphist/cray.htm http://americanhistory.si.edu/collections/comphist/cray.htm
- wmf 15y agoFor every CDC, I wonder how many scams were perpetrated at the same time.
- coryrc 15y agoFor every Facebook, I wonder how many startups failed at the same time. Oh, I guess the only people allowed to participate in high-ROI investments are the rich. We can't have little people competing! It might hurt their margins.
- wmf 15y agoMaybe there's a way to balance the needs of savvy but non-rich investors and legions of suckers.