3 ms·
> as a part of a swift and hopefully short response. Unfortunately that doesn’t work because once you decide to close them, you also need to decide to bite the
by tinus_hn 6y ago
> as a part of a swift and hopefully short response.
Unfortunately that doesn’t work because once you decide to close them, you also need to decide to bite the bullet and open them again.
And if it turns out it doesn’t work (or ‘doesn’t work enough’) and cases remain high, that’s a tough decision.
- II2II 6y agoI am not going to claim that it will always work, but it did work the one time our schools were shut down. That being said, we have kept numbers very low. This means the response can be targeted since tracing the source of an infection is more realistic. When it looked like schools would be affected, they were temporarily shut down. Since it came during the Christmas break, only seven days were lost for students and two for staff. The most recent increase did not affect schools, so the response was directed towards the most common causes of spread. Now that new cases are due to travel and direct contact with someone who has travelled, those targeted restrictions are being lifted. Is this approach going to be effective in the long run? Probably not. Remaining on guard for an extended duration is stressful and the virus will eventually catch us off guard. On the other hand, our children are still enjoying their childhood and the burden is not so heavy on adults.