Its pretty much what one would expect. There is a common 4chan "wisdom" that 90% of women want the 10% of men (the "chads") and are rather willing to share that

Its pretty much what one would expect. There is a common 4chan "wisdom" that 90% of women want the 10% of men (the "chads") and are rather willing to share that top 10% than settle for anyone of the bottom 90% of men. This seems to support that sentiment with slightly less dramatic numbers but i am also sure the author was biased by these incel communities it would be super interesting to have real scientists do a study on anonymised tinder-internal data. On the other hand i find little evidence for the outcome in general to be false. The only escape route i know of is to focus on more favorable sub communities that a) value monogamy for male and female members and b) have a major second value-system that reduces pool size and reduces community fluidity significantly. Random examples are small local communities like villages, religions, vegan groups. Whenever i observed a really attractive female with a very average partner and had a chance to find out the reason, the answer was never that the partner was rich, but always that they came from a distinct cultural background (religion, rare language or dialect, special geographic region) and valued the shared background higher than other factors.