4 ms·
On the WebGL mailing list someone mentioned that it's not HW accelerated except on Mac OSX which makes hard to see this as a fallback for WebGL. There is also t
by nkassis 15y ago
On the WebGL mailing list someone mentioned that it's not HW accelerated except on Mac OSX which makes hard to see this as a fallback for WebGL. There is also talk of using flash(molehill) as a fallback but that entails some conversion of things like shaders and sharing the data between the javascript vm and flash plugin etc.
EDIT: also for IE, it's probably best to just get Chrome Frames.
- daeken 15y agoHow well does WebGL work in Chrome Frame? I'm gonna be releasing an MVP of a product centered around WebGL and I've been thinking that GCF might be a good way to get it working on IE, but haven't yet tested. Would love to hear some experiences.
- paulirish 15y agoIt'll work as well in GCF as it will on Chrome in WinXP, which is to say, really well! There should not be a difference between the two.
- qmaqdk 15y agoJebGL uses JOGL which is hardware accelerated (unless you're running Mesa on Linux) on all platforms.
- nkassis 15y agoSorry I misread the email, you are right it's not that it only works on mac osx but that it is only supported in Safari on MacOSX due to a bug in JOGL. I really misread that the first time ;p