3 ms·

Your reply makes it sound like you missed the tone and context of the post. Light-hearted and intended to poke a few sacred cows... But also you seem to be den

Your reply makes it sound like you missed the tone and context of the post. Light-hearted and intended to poke a few sacred cows... But also you seem to be denying two important possibilities: 1. Something can be both flippant and insightful. 2. A "couple of sentences" is sometimes all that is needed to trigger a light-bulb moment in someone else's head. We're not writing legal treatices here. We're trying to transfer insight from one conscious brain to another using an imperfect medium.

gtsop 6y ago
> Your reply makes it sound like you missed the tone and context of the post. Light-hearted and intended to poke a few sacred cows... If that is the context and tone, then I must admit I missed it. > But also you seem to be denying two important possibilities I don't disagree this can happen. Let's see what the future will bring. Still I feel the writer could have done a better job going into more detail.