4 ms·
To me this blog doesn’t really formally/finally refute anything, but is simply saying “don’t over-engineer your solution”. > “dependency inversion has single-
by refactor_master 6y ago
To me this blog doesn’t really formally/finally refute anything, but is simply saying “don’t over-engineer your solution”.
> “dependency inversion has single-handedly caused billions of dollars in irretrievable sunk cost and waste over the last couple of decades”
Oh please. Is there anything in programming that hasn’t had the “Irreparable harm to humanity” sticker attached to it by now?
- gfody 6y agoI like to imagine a final analysis of all code ever written by humans, after some ai hypermind from the future has digested it, turning out to be 99.999% dependency injection boilerplate
- jonnypotty 6y agoSo becuase our industry is so unprofessional that you can literally point to loads of it and say "that has cost humanity billions", this entire argument is stupid and actually there is no problem at all? Not sure that's the right attitude.
- refactor_master 6y agoSo what would you have done to end up in the alternate universe where it hadn’t cost humanity billions? Rational agents and perfect knowledge does not exist outside of economic theories.
- AlphaSite 6y agoIt’s an industry which ha s probably generated trillions in value so it maybe a matter of perspective.
- hinkley 6y agoCloud computing, but only because we haven’t hit the trough of disillusionment yet.