4 ms·

You're still supposed to put locks on your doors even though it's the police's 'job' to prevent property crime. Moreover, I don't think many tech companies wan

You're still supposed to put locks on your doors even though it's the police's 'job' to prevent property crime. Moreover, I don't think many tech companies want to give the state the access required to impliment preventative security measures for them, they'd rather role them themselves to maintain control.

helge9210 6y ago
> You're still supposed to put locks on your doors Locks are for honest people. > to impliment preventative security measures for them That's not a job of the state. The job of the state is to punish (cyber)criminals. And it's not the harshness of the punishment that matters, it's the inevitability.
- mlyle 6y ago
  > Locks are for honest people. That's a great slogan. But-- your (cyber)security stance obviously affects your risk. There are things you can do with business model, stance, and organizational controls that absolutely affect your exposure to both cybercrime and real-world crime. Your home state can absolutely provide help in your strategy against (cyber)crime, but surely we also should probably avoid getting blackout drunk and flashing large sums of cash around dense urban cores, too.