5 ms·
Most devices charge with USB-B, not wirelessly. If they wanted to skip to USB-C, sure, that's fine. Including wireless would have been a good idea five years ag
by freeone3000 6y ago
Most devices charge with USB-B, not wirelessly. If they wanted to skip to USB-C, sure, that's fine. Including wireless would have been a good idea five years ago, when it started becoming popular. It's still popular today, but it's way too slow for modern phone battery capacities.
- ksec 6y ago>Most devices charge with USB-B Do you mean USB- A?
- freeone3000 6y agoNo. A is the host port. B is the side that connects to the device, with micro-B being the most common.
- ksec 6y ago>micro-B being the most common. I guess that is me sticking to Apple for long. I thought most Android devices has been on USB-C for 5 years?
- freeone3000 6y agoIt really depends on the price level of the phone. Non-flagship phones, like the Moto G9 and the Samsung A11, use micro-B and were released in 2019. USB-C is common in the $500+ market.
- ce4 6y agoI guess, micro USB.
- google234123 6y agoApple's one does 15W which is plenty.
- freeone3000 6y agoAt 15W, that would mean charging your phone would take over two hours. That's way behind their competition, and twice the time of even their anemic 20W wall charger.
- hu3 6y agoEven my friend's entry level $150 Xiaomi Note 7 comes with a 17W charger and supports up to 27W chargers.