3 ms·

a lot of M.2 2280 NVME SSD still being sold on the market are PCI-E 3.0. it is interesting to see its benchmarks against the samsung and other top tier competi

a lot of M.2 2280 NVME SSD still being sold on the market are PCI-E 3.0. it is interesting to see its benchmarks against the samsung and other top tier competitors.

riku_iki 6y ago
> a lot of M.2 2280 NVME SSD still being sold on the market are PCI-E 3.0. That's true, but there are multiple PCI-E 4.0 available on the market for a year already, with benchmarks available too..
- walrus01 6y ago
  but look at the benchmarks for this drive versus the Samsung 980 Pro 1TB. both are selling at $199 from newegg right now... but the WD sn850 blows away the 980 pro in nearly every benchmark. I still have a greater degree of trust in Samsung for reliability and greatly exceeding their specified write-endurances (torture tests of MLC samsungs from 3 years ago illustrate that for a desktop workstation, you would have to REALLY abuse them to ever run into the write endurance problem).
  - riku_iki 6y ago
    > but the WD sn850 blows away the 980 pro in nearly every benchmark. I think they have some cache tuning differences, because while WD wins in many benchmarks by 30-40%, it losses the same 30-40% on long sequential writes. I have no ssd expertise, so, can't comment why this could happen.
  - cm2187 6y ago
    What I am really surprised by is the price of the enterprise ones (samsung PM1735, you can get a 3.2tb for like £600). Barely more expensive than consumers with massive performance (8GB/s read) and endurance. Not sure where is the catch.
    - wtallis 6y ago
      The catch is that pricing and availability for grey-market enterprise drives is wildly inconsistent, and you often don't get a manufacturer's warranty. Also, enterprise drives don't use SLC write caching, so their peak write performance is usually substantially lower than on a consumer SSD. And not that it matters much for a desktop, but enterprise drives also don't do idle power management, so they stay pretty warm even when you're not using them.
  - ComputerGuru 6y ago
    It’s not just endurance. I wouldn’t use anything other than an older Samsung Pro (not an 850 Pro, before they went TLC), a Samsung Z, or an Intel Optane for something like a ZFS slog or a hardware RAID write accelerator cache - they have unmatched latency for these applications which cruet came by via their technical choices and is independent of write throughout.
Firerouge 6y ago
Even with it's big performance gains, optane is still well ahead in almost every benchmark. Shame more manufacturers don't make that type of drive
- deleted 6y ago
  [deleted]
- dylan604 6y ago
  If the price point of the Optane is keeping consumers from embracing them, then why not look for another way to make something the consumers are willing to buy? That's kind of what WD does. They have a huge chunk of the consumer market.
- jlgaddis 6y ago
  > Shame more manufacturers don't make that type of drive Now that Micron has apparently called it quits, it's a shame no manufacturers make that type of drive!

a lot of M.2 2280 NVME SSD still being sold on the market are PCI-E 3.0. it is interesting to see its benchmarks against the samsung and other top tier competitors.

riku_iki 6y ago

> a lot of M.2 2280 NVME SSD still being sold on the market are PCI-E 3.0. That's true, but there are multiple PCI-E 4.0 available on the market for a year already, with benchmarks available too..

walrus01 6y ago
but look at the benchmarks for this drive versus the Samsung 980 Pro 1TB. both are selling at $199 from newegg right now... but the WD sn850 blows away the 980 pro in nearly every benchmark. I still have a greater degree of trust in Samsung for reliability and greatly exceeding their specified write-endurances (torture tests of MLC samsungs from 3 years ago illustrate that for a desktop workstation, you would have to REALLY abuse them to ever run into the write endurance problem).
- riku_iki 6y ago
  > but the WD sn850 blows away the 980 pro in nearly every benchmark. I think they have some cache tuning differences, because while WD wins in many benchmarks by 30-40%, it losses the same 30-40% on long sequential writes. I have no ssd expertise, so, can't comment why this could happen.
- cm2187 6y ago
  What I am really surprised by is the price of the enterprise ones (samsung PM1735, you can get a 3.2tb for like £600). Barely more expensive than consumers with massive performance (8GB/s read) and endurance. Not sure where is the catch.
  - wtallis 6y ago
    The catch is that pricing and availability for grey-market enterprise drives is wildly inconsistent, and you often don't get a manufacturer's warranty. Also, enterprise drives don't use SLC write caching, so their peak write performance is usually substantially lower than on a consumer SSD. And not that it matters much for a desktop, but enterprise drives also don't do idle power management, so they stay pretty warm even when you're not using them.
- ComputerGuru 6y ago
  It’s not just endurance. I wouldn’t use anything other than an older Samsung Pro (not an 850 Pro, before they went TLC), a Samsung Z, or an Intel Optane for something like a ZFS slog or a hardware RAID write accelerator cache - they have unmatched latency for these applications which cruet came by via their technical choices and is independent of write throughout.

Firerouge 6y ago

Even with it's big performance gains, optane is still well ahead in almost every benchmark. Shame more manufacturers don't make that type of drive

deleted 6y ago
[deleted]
dylan604 6y ago
If the price point of the Optane is keeping consumers from embracing them, then why not look for another way to make something the consumers are willing to buy? That's kind of what WD does. They have a huge chunk of the consumer market.
jlgaddis 6y ago
> Shame more manufacturers don't make that type of drive Now that Micron has apparently called it quits, it's a shame no manufacturers make that type of drive!